Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Results from the recent survey

  1. #31
    scubamike's Avatar AF Millennium Member Pro Membership
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    36.8406S, 174.7400E
    Posts
    1,464
    Reviews Given
    2
    Credits
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stevesblues View Post
    <snip>
    Is it a permanent ban or 7 day jobbie
    I hope it is not a permanent ban.
    Last edited by scubamike; 07-04-2016 at 06:35 PM. Reason: I like to think that we can allow 1 or 2 strikes before someone is permanently banned.

  2. #32
    Adult Forum's Avatar AF Black Belt ADMINISTRATOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,122
    Reviews Given
    1
    Credits
    705,283,419,671,950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scubamike View Post
    I hope it is not a permanent ban.
    It is not.

  3. #33
    AF Black Belt Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    3,707
    Credits
    3,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chuckie2 View Post
    Lol . Didn't you get the joke ? Compliant people always disagree
    Naaa dont actually, I dont see it. "Compliant people always disagree" ?

  4. #34
    AF Black Belt Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    3,707
    Credits
    3,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scubamike View Post
    Peep like honest. Most peep in here speak their own minds. A lot chose not to get involved.

    One thing I had observed though - Most peep dont like shit stirring and expect a bit of empathy when someone opens up raw emotions. Just human decency.
    So like you say peep like honesty, but when someone opens up emotions and someone replies honestly, they can also not like it...... right.........

  5. 31-03-2017, 06:11 PM


  6. #35
    scubamike's Avatar AF Millennium Member Pro Membership
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    36.8406S, 174.7400E
    Posts
    1,464
    Reviews Given
    2
    Credits
    1,316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwi1492 View Post
    I posted a negative review for **DND** When I checked the DND this was the profile that showed up under ***DND**which has no profile attached to it and displayed this page-"Sorry, the escort you are looking for isn't available right now, please choose another escort." Assuming this WG was no longer active I posted my review. AFTER I posted my review, NZG added this profile **DND** which is the WG I reviewed and AFTER THE FACT blocked my post as a DND. Are we now assume that even if a WG is not on the DND and does not agree with a review, they can request to be placed on the DND after the review was posted and have it removed? This is a deceptive practice. I request an explanation why NZG did this.
    I can see you are royally pissed off but this post and 5 new threads of the same to make a point??

    Last edited by Adult Forum; 01-04-2017 at 07:07 PM. Reason: Removed referrence to DND SW

  7. #36
    Contributor Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    29
    Reviews Given
    15
    Credits
    297

    Thumbs up NZG practice

    I can see you are royally pissed off but this post and 5 new threads of the same to make a point??

    Good question. I wanted to make sure NZG knows about this (I will call on Monday too) and to let the "punters" know what is going on. I am not as concerned about my review being DNDd. I am more concerned if a WG uses unsafe practices like offering not to use condoms. 90% of the WGs I meet provide at least adequate service and are safe. It's the 10% that are the problem. If a punter posts a review about a WG not using condoms (hopefully he left before service!), the WG sees the post, asks NZG to put her on the DND and the review is removed, is this good for us and the business? No. Also, would they pull all previous reviews? This is the only forum us punters have to communicate about the WGs. What else could we do? Report it to the police (it is a breach of the law) HA! The punter would look like a fool and police would do nothing. Remember, individual WGs are totally unregulated. There is no one to report unsafe practices too except to post them here. I would like to know which WGs are doing unsafe practices or scamming clients so I can avoid them. If it was a tech glitch and the profile wasn't on the DND list, I would accept that. If that was the case, NZG should have emailed me, let me know they pulled it and said "sorry". It's called "good customer service". Caveat Emptor-let the buyer beware! No worries mate!

  8. #37
    AF 500 Club Member Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    oamaru
    Posts
    979
    Credits
    2,320

    Default

    I guess as a lot of us do not pay any money and the girls do they need to look after them after all this is where there income comes from not from us

    But it is like the chicken and the egg which comes first the W G or the client I guess they need both

    You see a few banned on here and just change there name and are back on the next day in one case the same day about 1 hour later

  9. #38
    Adult Forum's Avatar AF Black Belt ADMINISTRATOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,122
    Reviews Given
    1
    Credits
    705,283,419,671,950

    Default

    Kiwi1492 was temporarily banned for spamming the name of a DND WG, If a post is reported for being of a DND WG then it is removed, regardless of when she was added to the DND list. If it seems like an obvious attempt to hide a negative review its reported to NZG so that they can adreess it in whatever manner they see fit, its not in their best interest to promote women or agencies who heavily dissappoint or even decieve clients so Im sure they have proceedures in place or at least a plan to deal with it.

  10. #39
    Adult Forum's Avatar AF Black Belt ADMINISTRATOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,122
    Reviews Given
    1
    Credits
    705,283,419,671,950

    Default

    Also goes without saying there are multiple sides to every story, so hearing hers as well no doubt will be part of this , especially when there are potential legal accusations .
    Last edited by Adult Forum; 01-04-2017 at 09:41 PM.

  11. #40
    Adult Forum's Avatar AF Black Belt ADMINISTRATOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,122
    Reviews Given
    1
    Credits
    705,283,419,671,950

    Default

    Good question. I wanted to make sure NZG knows about this (I will call on Monday too) and to let the "punters" know what is going on. I am not as concerned about my review being DNDd. I am more concerned if a WG uses unsafe practices like offering not to use condoms. 90% of the WGs I meet provide at least adequate service and are safe. It's the 10% that are the problem. If a punter posts a review about a WG not using condoms (hopefully he left before service!), the WG sees the post, asks NZG to put her on the DND and the review is removed, is this good for us and the business? No. Also, would they pull all previous reviews? This is the only forum us punters have to communicate about the WGs. What else could we do? Report it to the police (it is a breach of the law) HA! The punter would look like a fool and police would do nothing. Remember, individual WGs are totally unregulated. There is no one to report unsafe practices too except to post them here. I would like to know which WGs are doing unsafe practices or scamming clients so I can avoid them. If it was a tech glitch and the profile wasn't on the DND list, I would accept that. If that was the case, NZG should have emailed me, let me know they pulled it and said "sorry". It's called "good customer service". Caveat Emptor-let the buyer beware! No worries mate!
    I've restored kiwi1492 last comment, had originally read it as him saying the lady he reviewed offered natural services which was not the case, and it was a hypothetical. (Sorry, Weekend + Jamesons)
    anyways. If a SW offers unprotected sex, above all else: Decline. The rest is up to you, if it happened to me I would try to talk some sense in her, explaining how dangerous it is and advise her to get tested and look into better brands of condoms if it is a feel/taste issue.
    If I'm not convince she'll change her ways I'd report her to NZG so her account manager can try to do the same from a woman's perspective.

    What I wouldn't do is post about her in Adult Forums, as that is also against the rules , regardless of if she was on the DND list or not. While you may see a list of WG's that offer natural services as a list to avoid, not all punters would agree, and some "less cautious" gents would jump at the opportunity to play STI roulette, and we would like to avoid assisting dangerously stupid behaviour whenever possible.

    Back to someone being DND'd after a negative review: We respect all NZG SW's requests to be added to the DND list, because you never know what they're going through, yes maybe they're just trying to hide a negative review to avoid losing potential clients, but maybe they just found out about the forum reviews through a review, and would've rather protected their privacy from the get go anyway, or maybe they started getting harassing phone calls after a nasty review. So we can't just tell them "sorry, your on DND now, but since this post was made before you requested it, we have to keep it up." I know it sucks for the reviewer, and sorry it has to go down this way, but it does.


    Edit: To report issues with NZG SW's (false advertising, offering illegal services etc) use the contact form here: Contact Us | NZ Girls
    Last edited by Adult Forum; 03-04-2017 at 10:06 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. What did everyone think of the Election results?
    By Waikato.male in forum Current Affairs and General News
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 25-09-2014, 10:11 PM
  2. Election results and the polls.
    By Digmen1 in forum Current Affairs and General News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 24-08-2013, 11:30 PM
  3. Punting Survey
    By slapper in forum The Lobby
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-08-2011, 04:52 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-06-2009, 01:40 PM
  5. Are you happy with the election results...
    By Guest 08 in forum Current Affairs and General News
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 18-11-2008, 11:56 PM

User Tag List

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •